From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 16 14:52:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BD637B6DF; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:52:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA17992; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:52:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:52:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Maxime Henrion Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is -STABLE broken ? In-Reply-To: <399A6E81.7615812D@qualys.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Maxime Henrion wrote: > It's weird because signal 4 is SIGILL, and means that an illegal > instruction has been caught. (exception #6 if I remember right). So it > looks like a bug in the compiler. > Here is my uname -a ouput : You forgot to mention what CPU - most likely thing is that you built the compiler using CPU optimizations which dont work for your CPU, like using -march=pentium on a 486 :-) Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message