From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 10:16:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032B537B401; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CCB43FCB; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:16:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4JHGfA9003834; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:16:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4JHGbHB003828; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:16:37 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <20030519171637.GA3807@dragon.nuxi.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Ian Dowse , mp@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org References: <20030518221457.GA4531@dragon.nuxi.com> <200305182350.aa53905@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305182350.aa53905@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kgdb missing stack frames X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:16:57 -0000 On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:50:56PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote: > Thanks, to get it to work I had to include tm.h first, as otherwise > I got lots of warnings about the macros that are first defined in > fbsd-kgdb-i386.h being redefined later: ... > I don't know whether including tm.h there is a reasonable thing to > do, but following patch seems to work. I've only tested it on the > i386, so I guess further changes will be needed for other architectures. I'll look into the correct place to put it -- tm is for the target, hm for the host.