From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 19 04:55:02 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA17183
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 04:55:02 -0700
Received: from redline.ru (root@mail.redline.ru [194.87.69.22])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id EAA17172
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 04:54:46 -0700
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 15:52:39 +0400 (GMT+0400)
From: Anthony Graphics <agl@mac.glas.apc.org>
X-Sender: agl@mail.redline.ru
To: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@freefall.cdrom.com>
cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Case for FreeBSD presentation docs?
In-Reply-To: <199504182132.OAA19525@freefall.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950419155012.75A-100000@mail.redline.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 18 Apr 1995, Jeffrey Hsu wrote:

> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 14:32:16 -0700
> From: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@freefall.cdrom.com>
> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org
> Subject: Re: Case for FreeBSD presentation docs?
> 
> Oh for heaven's sake.  Just invoke NIH and wish Linux away.  You are at
> an academic institution after all.  Seriously, just stress how good
> the BSD source base is over some home-grown Minix kernel and non-BSD
> TCP/IP.  Making a case for BSD should not be hard, especially since

I see no great things in BSD TCP/IP. It's nice to have _non BSD_
inplementation, because otherwise you can easily get trapped in some
bug you can't fix just humble opinion of the mere user.
AGL
> many of these professors, scratch that, all of them, the old ones at
> least, all used to run BSD on their VAXes and SunOS on their suns.
>