From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 15:55:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tonnant.cnchost.com (tonnant.concentric.net [207.155.248.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8B937B404 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bitblocks.com (adsl-209-204-185-216.sonic.net [209.204.185.216]) by tonnant.cnchost.com id SAA26897; Tue, 7 May 2002 18:55:30 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] Message-ID: <200205072255.SAA26897@tonnant.cnchost.com> To: Peter Wemm Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tic/tconv & friends In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 May 2002 14:09:04 PDT." <20020507210904.B15A138CC@overcee.wemm.org> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 15:55:30 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The Linux binary will not care what libraries FreeBSD uses, but as you > point out, we do not actually ship tic and infocmp and friends. There is a > ncurses port/package that does have tic/infocmp etc. The compiled format > is the same for them all. That is good enough. > We can probably build tic/infocmp on FreeBSD as well if there's demand for > it. I don't care how we get it as long as there is a way. But as I mentioned, the man pages should be fixed up. Thanks for your response! -- bakul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message