From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 18:41:33 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AF916A417 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jesper.louis.andersen@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FC113C480 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jesper.louis.andersen@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so1521948nfb for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:41:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=Opuv5B34cCEL6p0ANuf7MYK06LlywHliCGoR4Z+HV7w=; b=kDg9grF1Q8DRMp0Iax9dczVTgp3hKfKwjxNfvC1iiBCym/eruuNvCeJeDQqWsHrvRgyCdmfXeYXgnNGHIl2bgV1hMNqi0OdAjo3cIfXRLY2y0qiWQ+cd74Kxz/6irGZs4U5ForXSIX9qIhZWgP5P1HM7zjlIKN9vgQgFQohzPNQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=r7Upwbn1MGoLEmv94G+oIz+DgwBxREVlFR8o4frIBBUD7sLtMK5sspmpLNwayaggrET+WCyAOUPQNdlk6Q6KV/q8sD1Lm1zklutEkGgCsmqyeuL9od7ViVZmASIjKP90LGB3bQ7hAZk7u5GHmvgWpHEEV7M+OmmQHxqS9Y5Pnac= Received: by 10.86.51.2 with SMTP id y2mr3539222fgy.1190744184160; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.3.5 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <56a0a2840709251116l1b213dbbme5a317346de8c157@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:16:24 +0200 From: "Jesper Louis Andersen" To: x11@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: xf86-video-intel over xf86-video-i810 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:41:33 -0000 Hi Is there any particular reason for why xf86-video-i810 is chosen over xf86-video-intel by default in xorg-drivers? The latter seems a lot faster here, but maybe there are stability and HW compatibility issues? I just want to make sure this is not an oversight ;)