Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:42:44 -0500 (EST) From: Christopher Sedore <cmsedore@mailbox.syr.edu> To: Arjan de Vet <Arjan.deVet@adv.iae.nl> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, "John W. DeBoskey" <jwd@unx.sas.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, David Quattlebaum <sasdrq@unx.sas.com> Subject: Re: AIO was Re: Kernel threads Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10001061433220.9535-100000@rodan.syr.edu> In-Reply-To: <20000106095248.A10302@adv.iae.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Arjan de Vet wrote: > Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > >This is very interesting data and I was just wondering about the > >actual state of functionality in our AIO code just the other day, > >oddly enough. Does anyone have a PR# for the mentioned patches? > > kern/12053 > > A Dec 16 version of the patch can be found at: > > http://tfeed.maxwell.syr.edu/aio-diff > > They won't apply cleanly because some new syscalls have been added. There may be another PR related too (although a quick search a few seconds ago didn't show it)--this patch set also fixes a problem where signals were not posted for aio completion under certain circumstances (the code just wasn't there before). Just found the PR--kern/13075 -Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.4.10.10001061433220.9535-100000>