Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:13:09 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Two jail questions Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK3CUod4jg9gFwJ4k9VwAxcz%2BLU-2ds1W1ASz7Bcok=mGQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20171019180038.GA32097@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20171019173224.GA31648@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CA%2BtpaK2c99mSXXPVWLQL0q_%2BkJ-xtoLzJtjLqbxDzwTM5KKhNg@mail.gmail.com> <20171019180038.GA32097@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Steve Kargl < sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > sshd in the jail needs to run on a different port if you're using the > same > > ip, otherwise if you use an independent networking stack you would > > configure as normal. > > So, then this comes down to > > ssh normal@a.b.c.d <-- host system's sshd listening on default > port > ssh -p 1111 guest@a.b.c.d <-- jailed sshd listening on port 1111 > On a non-VNET/VIMAGE jail, this is the standard way. For a VNET/VIMAGE you could do a regular ssh guest@w.x.y.z since the jail would have it's own real ip. That is assuming you added the guest user to the jail and all the networking/routing is good. -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK3CUod4jg9gFwJ4k9VwAxcz%2BLU-2ds1W1ASz7Bcok=mGQ>