From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Jul 30 03:16:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1844D3751FF for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BHFtF41c5z4cMt; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06U3GQm2073926 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:16:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Matthew Macy In-Reply-To: From: Chris Reply-To: bsd-lists@BSDforge.com To: freebsd-current Subject: Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:16:32 -0700 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BHFtF41c5z4cMt X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:16:06 -0000 On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:16:28 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eorg said > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 21:06 Chris wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:50:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eorg said > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 20:43 Chris wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eorg s= aid > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eo= rg > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing = for > > the > > > > > > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs=2E We'd like to give users > > roughly a > > > > > > > month to test before merging=2E The tentative merge date is Au= gust > > > > > > > 17th=2E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out th= at > > > > > > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to > > avoid > > > > any > > > > > > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees > > following > > > > > > > the merge=2E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://people=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-= 2020072900/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used n= ow? > > > > > > > > > > The word "attempt" is a misnomer=2E If you search the mail archives > > this > > > > > has been the PoR for some time=2E > > > > Sure=2E OK=2E I caught this thread=2E But must have missed the announceme= nt > > > > of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs=2E > > > > Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? > > > > > > > > Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew=2E > > > > > > > > > > Apart from the 3 previous CFT mails, the initial intent was discussed= in > > > December 2018=2E Getting FreeBSD support integrated in to openzfs took = a > > lot > > > more incremental PRs than I anticipated=2E > > > > > > > > > > https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/07242= 2=2Ehtml > > > > Thank you very much, Mathew=2E Sorry for any bother=2E > > >=20 >=20 > No bother or not much at least=2E It=E2=80=99s just been a long haul and I= =E2=80=99d like > to > wrap this up=2E No doubt=2E FTR I'm not looking to impede you=2E :-) My only concern would be that I'd need to remaster the art of ZFS=2E I've got 1500 installs to maintain, and any changes tend to alarm me=2E :-) I see we're a bit behind the others, if this status report is current: https://docs=2Egoogle=2Ecom/spreadsheets/d/1CFapSYxA5QRFYy5k6ge3FutU7zbAWbaeGN2= nKVXgxCI/edit#gid=3D0 Will your impending commit move us closer? Is there anything others like myself can do to help? Thanks again, Matthew=2E --Chris >=20 > -M >=20 > >