Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:16:32 -0700 From: Chris <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> To: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Cc: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images Message-ID: <ee0389c93c3863ed1cf2a03436e106d9@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <CAPrugNqtU1S0figGUmSViiaF4vv-tPdkmZaYcQ705_RcUROghw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:16:28 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eorg said > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 21:06 Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge=2Ecom> wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:50:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eorg said > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 20:43 Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge=2Ecom> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eorg s= aid > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge=2Ecom> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eo= rg > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing = for > > the > > > > > > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs=2E We'd like to give users > > roughly a > > > > > > > month to test before merging=2E The tentative merge date is Au= gust > > > > > > > 17th=2E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out th= at > > > > > > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to > > avoid > > > > any > > > > > > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees > > following > > > > > > > the merge=2E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://people=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-= 2020072900/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used n= ow? > > > > > > > > > > The word "attempt" is a misnomer=2E If you search the mail archives > > this > > > > > has been the PoR for some time=2E > > > > Sure=2E OK=2E I caught this thread=2E But must have missed the announceme= nt > > > > of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs=2E > > > > Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? > > > > > > > > Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew=2E > > > > > > > > > > Apart from the 3 previous CFT mails, the initial intent was discussed= in > > > December 2018=2E Getting FreeBSD support integrated in to openzfs took = a > > lot > > > more incremental PRs than I anticipated=2E > > > > > > > > > > https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/07242= 2=2Ehtml > > > > Thank you very much, Mathew=2E Sorry for any bother=2E > > >=20 >=20 > No bother or not much at least=2E It=E2=80=99s just been a long haul and I= =E2=80=99d like > to > wrap this up=2E No doubt=2E FTR I'm not looking to impede you=2E :-) My only concern would be that I'd need to remaster the art of ZFS=2E I've got 1500 installs to maintain, and any changes tend to alarm me=2E :-) I see we're a bit behind the others, if this status report is current: https://docs=2Egoogle=2Ecom/spreadsheets/d/1CFapSYxA5QRFYy5k6ge3FutU7zbAWbaeGN2= nKVXgxCI/edit#gid=3D0 Will your impending commit move us closer? Is there anything others like myself can do to help? Thanks again, Matthew=2E --Chris >=20 > -M >=20 > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ee0389c93c3863ed1cf2a03436e106d9>