Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:26:00 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@freebsd.kde.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: Conflict between KDE and GNOME in a prefix... Message-ID: <44F30B08.6000902@marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <200608281824.03189.andy@athame.co.uk> References: <op.tevui9ub9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1156614644.475.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200608281824.03189.andy@athame.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andy Fawcett wrote: > Hi Joe, Mezz, Gnome, KDE, > > On Saturday 26 August 2006 20:50, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 03:43 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >>> Hello folks, >>> >>> We, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have successed to move GNOME from X11BASE >>> to LOCALBASE. There are three files that are conflict between KDE >>> and GNOME. The two files that need to be fix in the KDE side and >>> another file that is need to be fix both in the GNOME and KDE >>> sides. >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/conflict_prefix.txt >>> >>> etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu: >>> ============================================= >>> GNOME and KDE teams will have to figure how to solve this problem. >>> Take the looks at the other Linux distros or so would be a good >>> start. If you have any good suggest, let us know. >> We might need to create a small port that just handles conflicting >> files such as this one. applications.menu is not huge, and should be >> interchangeable between GNOME and KDE. > > How different are the versions installed by Gnome & KDE? > > But yes, possibly we need an 'xdg-menu' port to cover such files. mezz could probably better answer this. They should be comparable since we're using the same xdg stuff. > >>> ============================================= >>> >>> libdata/pkgconfig/system-tools-backends.pc: >>> ============================================= >>> Need to be fix in the KDE side, not sure why kdeadmin installs >>> system-tools-backends's file? How about disable install it or have >>> kdeadmin depends on sysutils/system-tools-backends? >> Agreed. Depending on system-tools-backends will not bring in any >> unnecessary GNOME baggage for KDE. > > Lofi has already made a change to deal with this in the (not yet > committed) KDE 3.5.4 ports. Great! > >>> ============================================= >>> >>> share/icons/hicolor/index.theme: >>> ============================================= >>> Need to be fix in the KDE side. The kdelibs will have to change the >>> path or/and create patch, because hicolor-icon-theme is a fd.org >>> icon standard. The hicolor-icon-theme is not exactly a GNOME stuff, >>> which it's for general desktops. >> Same as above. misc/hicolor-icon-theme does not depend on any GNOME >> bits, so adding a dependency on it should not be a big deal, yes? > > Probably doable as suggested. Not sure how different the hicolor theme > installed by KDE is to the hicolor-icon-theme port, but I'm sure the > problem is solvable. The hicolor-icon-theme port is taken straight off of freedesktop.org. This should be as standard as possible. > >> What say you, kde@? > > Well, I'll let lofi comment on things better (since he's more familiar > with the KDE ports structure than I am), but personally I think it > should be ok. Excellent. Thanks for your feedback. Joe - -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE8wsHb2iPiv4Uz4cRAg6yAJ4nHLTy/EUkv0roShc2ao7+81NnnQCfQr1j wz1PG+3lez8Mml+UrevVfqA= =wt5l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44F30B08.6000902>