From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 2 21:55:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBBC16A4CE; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:55:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC4243D2F; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:55:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-239-141.zoominternet.net [24.154.239.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i72LtXmR027277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:55:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:55:44 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: John Baldwin Message-Id: <20040802175544.0211d312@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200408021600.00339.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <200408011140.i71BesOt070889@repoman.freebsd.org> <200408021600.00339.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Mark Murray cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha mem.c src/sys/alpha/conf GENERIC src/sys/alpha/include memdev.h src/sys/amd64/amd64 io.c mem.c src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC NOTES src/sys/amd64/include iodev.h memdev.h src/sys/conf NOTES files files.alpha files.amd64 ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 21:55:51 -0000 On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:00:00 -0400 John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday 01 August 2004 07:40 am, Mark Murray wrote: > > markm 2004-08-01 11:40:54 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/alpha/alpha mem.c > > sys/alpha/conf GENERIC > > sys/amd64/amd64 mem.c > > sys/amd64/conf GENERIC NOTES > > sys/conf NOTES files files.alpha files.amd64 > > files.i386 files.ia64 files.pc98 > > files.sparc64 > > [ ... ] > > Why in the world are /dev/null and /dev/zero optional? /dev/[k]mem > and /dev/io I can accept for those with uber-high security paranoia, but I > can't think of any good reason to have a kernel without /dev/null > and /dev/zero. To me it seems that this creates way more foot shooting > potential than benefit. It's one thing to have device drivers for hardware > that may or may not be present optional, but /dev/null and /dev/zero do not > fall into that case. Foot shooting potential? Please, we have other "KEEP THIS" listed for COMPAT_43, why not the same here? Like: device null KEEP THIS! device zero KEEP THIS TOO! -- Tom Rhodes