Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:21:07 +0200 From: Diego Depaoli <trebestie@gmail.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, Martin Tournoij <carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705 Message-ID: <83e5fb980908040921ua7c5ffavff8cee71a9fa7824@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A785310.6070109@FreeBSD.org> References: <20090706014719.GG11993@lonesome.com> <070151759cb2aacd36a14eb4b318a435@xs4all.nl> <20090716181711.GC90253@comcast.net> <36957fedc04d840595162bb026a8ec62@xs4all.nl> <20090801114833.GA23826@lonesome.com> <83e5fb980908040459k2e533ab4o2d23b229f98b8ace@mail.gmail.com> <4A785310.6070109@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/8/4 Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>: > Diego Depaoli wrote: >> There are too many ports and too few people who care them. >> IMHO the options are: >> - decrease the number of ports > We trim dead/useless ports all the time. >> - increase the number of =A0volunteers/committers/testers... > This is the only valid answer for FreeBSD. How? I think your following comment (even smiled) isn't the right starting point. >> - switch to a multi-level solution (e.g. Archlinux). > In DiegoBSD you should feel free to use any solution you think is > useful. :) Please look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/134443 Ok, I agree, is an useless port, but 3 months without further notices are enough to demotivate any volunteer. Cheers --=20 Diego Depaoli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?83e5fb980908040921ua7c5ffavff8cee71a9fa7824>