From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 11 9:58:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from donhm.calcasieu.com (tcnet01-45.austin.texas.net [209.99.40.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5118314DB9 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 09:58:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dread@texas.net) Received: from donhm.calcasieu.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by donhm.calcasieu.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA95845; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 11:58:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dread@texas.net) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3.1 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199910111624.MAA31464@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 11:58:01 -0500 (CDT) From: Don Read To: cjclark@home.com Subject: RE: XClock UTC? Cc: (FreeBSD Questions) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 11-Oct-99 Crist J. Clark wrote: > Just kind of a quick, general question about a standard X utility, > xclock. > > Is there a way to get it to display UTC (equivalent of 'date -u') boom.dread$ TZ=GMT0GMT;export TZ;xclock & > rather than local time? For that matter, is there a way to feed it a > strftime(3)-style argument? It just strikes me that something that > would seem so simple to add to it would not exist... I mean, this is > X, how can it not be user-configurable to a fault? ;) > source code is configurable to a fault too. Regards, --- Don Read dread@calcasieu.com EDP Manager dread@texas.net Calcasieu Lumber Co. Austin TX -- the Y2K bug is not a problem. W2K however ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message