From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 5 12:21:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1767C1065670 for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 12:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02278FC0C for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 12:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1DE33BAE1; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 May 2009 08:21:50 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: jUC2xjJQVEUA1McTWZVxGgFyUejb7UGyuTklDsWWZvY5 1241526109 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90EF8362EE; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:21:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A002F59.1000000@incunabulum.net> Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 13:21:45 +0100 From: Bruce Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?SklOTUVJIFRhdHV5YSAvIOelnuaYjumBlOWTiQ==?= References: <49FB327E.3010504@incunabulum.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net Subject: Re: Request feedback on IPv6 multicast listen on :: X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 12:21:51 -0000 JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: > I believe you can safely remove it. The KAME repository version of > that code was already deprecated long time ago. Thanks for clearing this up. I couldn't find anything which referenced the code, and as you pointed out its implementation was not complete, so I will leave it out. regards, BMS