From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 23 11:40:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E461F16A432 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 11:40:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C106B43D1F for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 11:40:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4NBe46L012791 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 11:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4NBe4EZ012790; Mon, 23 May 2005 11:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 11:40:04 GMT Message-Id: <200505231140.j4NBe4EZ012790@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gnome@FreeBSD.org From: Rong-En Fan Cc: Subject: Re: ports/80705: [PATCH] converters/libiconv: includes a patch for Big5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Rong-En Fan List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 11:40:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/80705; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rong-En Fan To: Bruno Haible Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/80705: [PATCH] converters/libiconv: includes a patch for Big5 Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 19:33:03 +0800 The patch is originally came from Kuang-che Wu at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~r92030/project/big5/ I'll contact him and see how to solve this. Thanks, rafan. On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:05:15PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > The libiconv-big5-2003.patch.gz has the following problems: > - It reuses the name "BIG5" to denote something different than classical > BIG5, thus creating interoperability problems. This is a VERY BAD idea. > - The patch doesn't pass the round-trip test (many private area mappings > missing from the Big5-2003 -> Unicode direction). > - It breaks the CP950 encoding. > - It is based on a mapping table that has some problematic mappings. > (12 known problems). > > Bruno >