From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat May 18 06:39:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8577615A9EB5; Sat, 18 May 2019 06:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [IPv6:2607:f440::d144:58f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2C606C36F; Sat, 18 May 2019 06:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E96933E01; Sat, 18 May 2019 02:39:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anthias (unknown [46.57.103.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3590033DFC; Sat, 18 May 2019 02:39:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 08:39:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "Jason W. Bacon" cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r501873 - in head/biology: . gemma gemma/files In-Reply-To: <201905171445.x4HEjKE4084764@repo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201905171445.x4HEjKE4084764@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D2C606C36F X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 06:39:58 -0000 On Fri, 17 May 2019, Jason W. Bacon wrote: > +USES= blaslapack:openblas compiler:c++11-lang eigen:3 gmake \ > + localbase:ldflags Mk/Uses/compiler.mk has .if ${_COMPILER_ARGS:Mc++11-lang} .if !${COMPILER_FEATURES:Mc++11} .if (defined(FAVORITE_COMPILER) && ${FAVORITE_COMPILER} == gcc) || (${ARCH} != amd64 && ${ARCH} != i386) # clang not always supported on Tier-2 USE_GCC= yes CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE= gcc .elif ${COMPILER_TYPE} == gcc .if ${ALT_COMPILER_TYPE} == clang CPP= clang-cpp CC= clang CXX= clang++ CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE= clang .else > +# Force newer GCC on platforms using GCC 4.2 as base > +.if ${CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE} == gcc > +USE_GCC= yes > +.endif ...so already USE_GCC=yes for this case. Why did you (have to?) add the second snippet above? Gerald