From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Apr 24 12:41:45 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from chmod.ath.cx (CC2-861.charter-stl.com [24.217.115.99])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D8D37B42C
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 12:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx)
Received: by chmod.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 883DBA90D; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:40:45 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:40:45 -0500
From: Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>
To: Andre Goeree <abgoeree@uwnet.nl>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports-supfile (-picobsd -science)
Message-ID: <20010424144045.A8575@cec.wustl.edu>
References: <20010424203624.A11671@mandark.attica.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010424203624.A11671@mandark.attica.home>; from abgoeree@uwnet.nl on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:36:24PM +0200
X-Loop: Andrew Hesford
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:36:24PM +0200, Andre Goeree wrote:
> [output from CVSup logfile]
> Exchanging collection information
> Server message: Unknown collection "ports-picobsd"
> Server message: Unknown collection "ports-science"
> [snip]
> Skipping collection ports-picobsd/cvs
> Skipping collection ports-science/cvs
> 
> Are these collections not enabled yet? 
> Would specifying ports-all instead of the seperate collections make
> any difference?
> 
> -Andre.

I've never heard of a ports that have anything to do with PicoBSD;
PicoBSD itself is part of the main source tree
(/usr/src/release/picobsd). As for ports-science, I have a ports/science
directoy in the tree...

Yes, specifying ports-all will get everything the tree has, without
breaking.

-- 
Andrew Hesford
ajh3@chmod.ath.cx

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message