Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:31:42 +0900 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com> To: Brett Wynkoop <freebsd-arm@wynn.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs on BeagleBone Message-ID: <B4AFCB30-B819-4FD3-837F-3A34F4DA8800@me.com> In-Reply-To: <20150313021110.71a896c6@ivory.wynn.com> References: <20150311130932.3493a938@ivory.wynn.com> <20150313001408.24fc1469@ivory.wynn.com> <15F9FA58-9412-4F45-BCB0-0C7F79FBF1F9@me.com> <20150313021110.71a896c6@ivory.wynn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13 Mar 2015, at 15:11, Brett Wynkoop <freebsd-arm@wynn.com> wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:19:23 +0900 > Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com> wrote: >=20 >=20 >> While it's very encouraging that ZFS is performing well on the >> BeagleBone, it's, at the same time, worrisome that UFS performs so >> poorly. UFS is supposed to deal very well with small embedded >> systems/filesystems and ZFS is supposed to deal very well with big >> systems/filesystems. I haven't really had any problems with UFS on >> my BeagleBone. >=20 > I have no problem with UFS on the sd card, but UFS on ANY USB FLASH = has > been a failure on the BeagleBone. Are you doing UFS on USB FLASH? Hmm, no, I haven't tried that. I honestly have no idea why it would = work better with ZFS. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B4AFCB30-B819-4FD3-837F-3A34F4DA8800>