Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 08:25:06 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> To: Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> Cc: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mutt was a failure, alternatives? Message-ID: <20140402062506.GA4913@sh4-5.1blu.de> In-Reply-To: <20140402060422.GA25437@SDF.ORG> References: <20140402051254.GA20229@SDF.ORG> <20140402131849.6ec27474@X220.alogt.com> <20140402060422.GA25437@SDF.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El día Wednesday, April 02, 2014 a las 06:04:23AM +0000, Mayuresh Kathe escribió: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:18:49PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 05:12:55 +0000 > > Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> wrote: > > > > > hello, > > > my attempt at compiling mutt with sasl support was > > > a major failure. > > > may i know the usual approach used for email under > > > freebsd 10? > > > > I use Claws-Mail under X. > > ah, okay, i was looking for a command line alternative. :) > > do people still go for the seperated mta + mua approach? I do use mutt+sendmail in FreeBSD 10, mutt compiled from the ports. What was/is your problem compiling mutt with SASL support? matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140402062506.GA4913>