From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 10:46:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4035137B71C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:46:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2KIjso09150; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:45:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:45:54 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Jan Conrad Cc: Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Jan Conrad wrote: > We're making plans to upgrade our NFS server to FreeBSD-4.3 (including > new disks...) and I would like to ask about the status of NFS v3? Why do you need NFSv3? Are there particular features in NFSv3 that you need or are you just guessing that v2 > v3 and therefore better? > Currently, a standard NFS mount (4.3BETA) gives us a sequential writing > speed of approx. 2Mb/s (just 400Mb dd'd data, IBM DTLA-307045 with > softupdates) and reading speed of 9Mb/s (the maximum). What is the speed of your network? > Mounting via TCP gives us 2.5Mb/s. (Is this safe?) Why are you using TCP? If you are on a reliable LAN, use UDP. TCP should be used for long haul NFS. There are lots of reasons for using UDP, if you want me to go into them, I will. > Are there any other possibilities to increase the writing speed (by means > of tuning NFS...)? Again, try UDP. Also, go pick up the O'Reilly book on NFS and NIS. Alot of what I'm going to tell you is in there (indeed the book is on my desk at work). -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message