From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 11 15:20:19 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4F5CB1
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:20:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA00B272
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:20:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1XcySu-000KIn-BK; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:20:16 +0200
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:20:16 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,
 Lukas Ruf <Lukas.Ruf@lpr.ch>
Subject: Re: print/muttprint
Message-ID: <20141011152016.GA78035@home.opsec.eu>
References: <20141011114310.GA4035@unixarea.DDR.dd>
 <20141011115119.GI29437@home.opsec.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141011115119.GI29437@home.opsec.eu>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:20:19 -0000

Hi!

> > I need print/muttprint to print my mails.

> > Should I file a PR with the patch or could someone commit it?
> 
> A PR is always preferred for the audit trail. I committed it, with
> the change of maintainer mentioned below.

mat@ mailed that

USE_TEX=latex dvipsk

should be used instead of the two additional run_deps.

Can you test if this works in your use-case and report the results ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         6 years to go !