From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 27 15:14:45 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA685FDC
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:14:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773C71DAD
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:14:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r3RFEYAa082441;
 Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:14:34 +0400 (MSK)
 (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from glebius@localhost)
 by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r3RFEYlF082440;
 Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:14:34 +0400 (MSK)
 (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to
 glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:14:34 +0400
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com>
Subject: Re: pf performance?
Message-ID: <20130427151434.GA76816@glebius.int.ru>
References: <5176E5C1.9090601@soe.ucsc.edu>
 <20130426134224.GV76816@FreeBSD.org>
 <CA+q+Tcru+YRc5JAumHBtWUu8C-WOFiAC3AckMmYthmZK9mT=MQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130427055349.GW76816@glebius.int.ru>
 <D19FA79A-5976-4E1D-A977-11747A672CA9@netgate.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D19FA79A-5976-4E1D-A977-11747A672CA9@netgate.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Olivier Cochard-Labb? <olivier@cochard.me>,
 "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
 Erich Weiler <weiler@soe.ucsc.edu>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:14:46 -0000

  Jim,

On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 07:58:04AM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
J> > Unfortunately, as you see, most people avoid running head, waiting at least for 10.0-RELEASE, or even for pfSense catching up on FreeBSD 10. So probably this change won't be tested soon, and thus won't happen soon,
J> As a minor part of the pfSense team, I believe you are mistaken. 
J> 
J> I'm out of the office right now, but when I return, I'd already planned to duplicate the test in a test harness with several multi-core boxes acting as source & sink, and the DUT to include several popular platforms for pfSense running a set of software including running same across -HEAD, 9-STABLE, and 8.3, both with the pfSense patches (as pfSense), and without. 
J> 
J> I doubt I'll get this done prior to BSDcan, but I'll get it done, if only for internal reasons.  

Good news! Thanks, Jim!

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.