Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:44:35 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BOOTX64.EFI padding Message-ID: <CAHu1Y724f4u46gLYagQ7NLDRSikZg32CPoujtuH-TQxUep3Ocg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20201223041907.GA28380@admin.sibptus.ru> References: <20201223041907.GA28380@admin.sibptus.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, this may not be relevant, but what partition scheme? On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 8:19 PM Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > From reading uefi(8) one can make the conclusion that boot1.efi is > *the* binary which is put to the EFI partition as BOOTx64.efi. > > However when I examine the files /boot/boot1.efi and > /mnt/efi/boot/BOOTx64.efi (or BOOTx64.efi from the /boot/boot1.efifat > filesystem image), I see that BOOTx64.efi is first identical to > boot1.efi, but then it's padded with spaces. Why is that? > > > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ > --=20 "Well," Brahm=C4=81 said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is = no wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mah=C4=81bh=C4=81rata
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y724f4u46gLYagQ7NLDRSikZg32CPoujtuH-TQxUep3Ocg>