From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 29 22:41:28 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CFB91C1
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:41:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org",
 Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DFDE2DB
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:41:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Julian-MBP3.local ([202.90.207.97]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s2TMfGII026654
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <53374C0B.1050901@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 09:41:15 +1100
From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
 Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A proposal
References: <CA+WntOvERMgdpQyY0te=e6su04fn6izdGt_etz2mSEEmD2WzNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <53365D6F.5020804@allanjude.com>
 <CA+WntOsh62fkJV8D+9-Hfeur-94KEGndD27uakgCoo3g9_4N2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140329055249.GA69809@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20140329055249.GA69809@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:41:28 -0000

On 3/29/14, 4:52 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 01:46:15AM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Allan Jude <freebsd@allanjude.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014-03-29 01:22, Joe Nosay wrote:
>>>> I have noticed that options VPS, VIMAGE, and MROUTING are not standard
>>> for
>>>> the kernel with a base install. Is there any way that these can be made a
>>>> part of the normal kernel so that jail(s) would get the full benefit
>>>> without a kernel recompile?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>> VIMAGE has some problems with PF. Martin Matu ska said at AsiaBSDCon
>>> that he had a patch that solves the issue.
>> Really, you say? That's good news.
>> So, will those options soon be standard for a first time install?
> Certainly, hope not.  I don't use any of options.
funnily, the only profiling speed differences we've seen with enabling 
netgraph is speedups :-)
especially with comparing many sessions on one vnet with the same 
number of sessions on several vnets.

Last time I tested it, putting several services on different vimage 
jails and assigning them different interfaces actually ran faster than 
having the same services on the same VM (machine).