From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 13 17:33:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0D5C10A93 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B98B04 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 67FCAC10A92; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678ACC10A91 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D1BB02 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id m5so52367493qtb.3 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:33:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=r2+gBmzL/wHvpQKnY94OISldA3Oj3yOhrSPFwMpIFfw=; b=NYKE5momBFDLdP403M+beG91NWY0HDluO4fyoriAWuw5STSaqd59rncq1lW/Ig4pLY yBfTsMK76MHqHRxdubOAENfX7sxiU5kH+JZu6n0i+IgGeN9grN/lrsCcRuBFx+GNTAVo 5yQmxJKVjsYea3J1FSz39Ahf5Jc1I8ph61In9CECg+T17scwr3W/MtqZpPVxyDBR44JH apoyEu93c8GAZELZEC7Fgt+rOw+zGb3po9iLBb+Q883FBk6Pi4vTE77KvzbVT3Y+E0QX j32LobSLE03oW/Fw+ULEqDsgahW7eCqqlIJzwjz67b8sAzlSgdJe9b5Iucdb1XsdpBeZ Ry9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r2+gBmzL/wHvpQKnY94OISldA3Oj3yOhrSPFwMpIFfw=; b=TDTiVtFb7Q7Fn4BPq5oLi2lNsMhb96+XPIYvqD0vRyp0OvDic31B9VC/5uvbx/DPKE /is0GBsu8xKYOlCy+y+P/SqIvAFruTykGFQei8TemAMZUibBHyuVHP7gZ7b/xp6gqqrf WqSMy6zjBkLfF8xOngXm5BOk4B41+kvS0KjkkxPf0OqonUByj2j9ewjnpfGmzYqevi6z nef8i8u8jW7/2FKZOsa9xROMGSGSqALjauvFEk7Fl8a5EVbZxUblEo8eJZgedXUgztTP Y5/8amefwWmhtbiJj8mSrz97I8QMqrVBtW/c9GSMJ1aiSywAW3gRjfla9KhCjaNICzMs tz1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkrEBKrNZ9xeeVAEo5lh7S4zwyl1Ckm+klM9akXyd+Ivg4lQzW/eEjSCTuyeeSBjg== X-Received: by 10.28.191.92 with SMTP id p89mr2958516wmf.114.1476380021989; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([81.17.24.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qq7sm24129785wjc.30.2016.10.13.10.33.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:33:38 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg Message-ID: <20161013183338.42f6777d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <638fe078-80db-2492-90be-f1280eb8d445@freebsd.org> References: <638fe078-80db-2492-90be-f1280eb8d445@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:33:43 -0000 On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:59:47 -0700 Julian Elischer wrote: > As the number of dependencies between packages get ever higher, it > becomes more and more difficult to compile packages and the > dependence on binary precompiled packages is increased. However > binary packages are unsuitable for some situations. We really need > to follow the lead of some of the Linux groups and have -runtime and > -devel versions of packages, OR we what woudlbe smarter, woudl be > to have several "sub manifests" to allow unpacking in different > environments. > > > A simple example: libxml2 > > This package installs include files and libraries and dicumentation > etc. > > yet if I build an appliance , I want it to only install a singe file. > > /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2 What practical problem does installing the include files and man pages cause you?