Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:36:50 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: Pierre-Luc Drouin <pldrouin@pldrouin.net>, acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance problem since updating from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE last friday Message-ID: <yged5kt1hgt.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <438213E5.70508@root.org> References: <4377775B.3080606@pldrouin.net> <20051114105854.GA1041@galgenberg.net> <4378CC14.2020109@pldrouin.net> <ygek6f9g83g.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <438213E5.70508@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:37:25 -0800
>>>>> Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> said:
> The cmbat has similar issue on some laptops. So, acpi_cmbat.c uses
> cache for retrieval to reduce its influence, and its expiration
> time is set by hw.acpi.battery.info_expire.
> However, acpi_smbat.c doesn't use cache. So, I made a patch. Since I
> don't have a laptop which has smbat, I cannot test it by myself.
> Please test it and let me know the result.
nate> The patch looks good to me, you should commit please.
Thanks for your review. I've just committed it into HEAD.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yged5kt1hgt.wl%ume>