From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 18 20:10:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC8916A41C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:10:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6753643D4C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:10:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3ADC60F3; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:10:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8F360F2; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:10:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 22FC533CDC; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:10:24 +0200 (CEST) To: Avleen Vig References: <1116331180.20050618143520@andric.com> <20050618200344.GX11612@silverwraith.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:10:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050618200344.GX11612@silverwraith.com> (Avleen Vig's message of "Sat, 18 Jun 2005 13:03:44 -0700") Message-ID: <863brfe89b.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -5.2/5.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on tim.des.no Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric , Kevin Day Subject: Re: Long uptime 5.2.1 server X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:10:32 -0000 Avleen Vig writes: > There were always two things I would recommend waiting for before moving > to 5.x: > 1. Performance. I remember reading the after 5.0's release, much > debugging code was still in the OS and kernel which would reduce > performance. This debugging code is controlled by kernel options (INVARIANTS, WITNESS etc.). Those options were included in GENERIC in early 5.x releases, but were removed before 5.3 (and you could always remove or comment them out yourself). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no