From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 5 15:44:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA20695 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 15:44:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA20687 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 15:44:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA03303; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 16:44:27 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.1.19981105163821.00c0dbb0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: brett@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 16:44:07 -0700 To: "Jason C. Wells" From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Linux "best of breed?" Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <4.1.19981105142239.00c6f340@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, I'm sorry, but I don't continue to nag, it doesn't look as if anything is going to happen. Fact is, FreeBSD is losing fast to Linux in mindshare, and if this trend isn't turned around soon there will be no way to do anything about it later. You'll see lots of great UNIX programming tools, applications, etc. coded in a way that's so Linux-specific that you won't be able to get by without a Linux box. Do you really want to have to shake your head and tell people, "I'd like to recommend FreeBSD for this task, but under the circumstances you'd really best go with Linux?" Sorry to disturb you, but this is your wake-up call. --Brett Glass At 02:13 PM 11/5/98 -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote: >On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Brett Glass wrote: > >>Oh, I forgot: FreeBSD doesn't DO PR. > >Would you get off it? > >Catchya Later, | UW Mechanical Engineering >Jason Wells | http://weber.u.washington.edu/~jcwells/ > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message