From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 18:12:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3666106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878E58FC17 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:24ff:498:f97a:a670] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:24ff:498:f97a:a670]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71C605C37; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:12:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E305510.1010900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:12:32 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Shuvaev References: <20110727101918.GA86589@lexx.ifp.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20110727101918.GA86589@lexx.ifp.tuwien.ac.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [clang] OpenOffice does not work with clang-compiled libgcc_s.so.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:12:33 -0000 On 2011-07-27 12:19, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: ... > So, if I compile the whole world (and kernel) with clang, soffice.bin > dumps core. If I recompile the world with gcc and replace /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > with the new one, OpenOffice works fine again. Hmm, OpenOffice is a rather unwieldy testcase, not in the least because it takes ages and many gigabytes to build. :( Did you or anyone else ever find a smaller testcase?