From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Nov 28 20:11:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA01325
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 28 Nov 1997 20:11:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from freebsd.scds.com (jseger.shore.net [204.167.102.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA01318
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Nov 1997 20:11:15 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jseger@freebsd.scds.com)
Received: (from jseger@localhost)
	by freebsd.scds.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) id XAA12193
	for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Nov 1997 23:30:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 23:30:39 -0500 (EST)
From: "Justin M. Seger" <jseger@freebsd.scds.com>
Message-Id: <199711290430.XAA12193@freebsd.scds.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: lynx
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Should we perhaps have a lynx and a lynx-current port?  It seems that whenever
I go to build lynx these days, the distfile isn't available on any sites because
it's out of date.
Any opinions?

Thanks,
-Justin Seger-