From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 8 08:46:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21159106564A for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:46:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com [209.85.220.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF128FC14 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so27669fxm.3 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:46:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vzhGnLvP81kbYXwGftZOl7hTyV/ATS357b/vOKwMfBE=; b=aqnssRpgcqVTJdJ40SyfsSwwNizjD5ALzQ4fno+vqy/KevG9vfIz3kG9+XYfg8kVtA qJLqldPmrRnMLC9HkMhjWxVhwvCnCwYWDGDRTQjHXKh5D4ItXLql3p2Q+vdAIZcjogdH MAdwstPn+lq+6w8AEM8GgiM/CB8qC6JIa9rb0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=bjXxvnAS6QMRiP9qRF/k2QgFSLjUBX9SsUGWn8HdV8SVrYLIiRi5A0DsJC9iPc6sLe /uHT+E2paGwfoIkHbphihNnPAc7yDbTTR0U2/igXL6opOUggb91yYVGBioU3qgLH5/0N 3EPs3sFEn9GvYLwB1/oTspYdqo4M69cUibSKI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.157.136 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 01:46:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100407173334.GC76941@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20100407173334.GC76941@dan.emsphone.com> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:46:04 +0100 Received: by 10.239.193.144 with SMTP id j16mr444611hbi.76.1270716364190; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: krad To: Dan Nelson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Freddie Cash , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When will we can use ZFS v24? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:46:06 -0000 On 7 April 2010 18:33, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 07), krad said: > > On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy wrote: > > > > What's your mean?? > > > > > > See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two > > > separate groups working on getting ZFSv22 added to FreeBSD 9-CURRENT. > > > And there's work ongoing to get ZFSv15 added to FreeBSD 8-STABLE. > > > > > > IOW, just be patient. Good things will come to those who wait. ;) > > > > If you re hankering for dedup you better have a big box as its a complete > > resource hog. From what we have seen on our x4500 filers we need about > > 100gig of ram or l2arc ssd to hold the all the metadata for the 34TB of > > storage, otherwise the system grinds to a halt. > > I wish they had an option for "opportunistic" dedup, where if a block is > already in ARC it can be a dedupe candidate, but it won't look it up in the > DDT if it isn't already in memory. That catches the simple "cp -R dir1 > dir2" cases without blowing up the ARC on DDT blocks that 99.9999% of the > time don't match. > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ZFS is still currently in heavy development so it might happen. Having siad that it looks like oracle have totally buggered it up for everyone with their retroactive licenses. I hope the CDL was tight enough that stuff wont have to get pulled from freebsd