From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 16 18:11: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8D31505E for ; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 18:10:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA16371; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 18:10:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA66976; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 18:10:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 18:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199906170110.SAA66976@vashon.polstra.com> To: ust@cert.siemens.de Subject: Re: m3socks and cvsup In-Reply-To: <19990608084217.A5098@alaska.cert.siemens.de> References: <19990601190941.46F9F2921C@localhost.localdomain> <199906080624.AAA03373@harmony.village.org> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <19990608084217.A5098@alaska.cert.siemens.de>, Udo Schweigert wrote: > I'm using it (runsocks cvsup -P m) for a year now and it works > without any problems. (Since cvsup 16 the "-P m" is not needed, so > "runsocks cvsup" should so it). Just to make sure I understand: You're using standard socks rather than m3socks, right? I believe that standard socks should work with cvsup's multiplexed mode, but I've never tried it. It would probably be necessary to add "@M3novm" to the command line, though. If standard socks works, then I want to eliminate m3socks. There are some problems with m3socks that I just found out about recently. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-interest is the aphrodisiac of belief." -- James V. DeLong To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message