Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:20:29 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew <ponomarew@oberon.net> To: Eugene Ossintsev <osgene@web.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11-toolkits/py-qt and devel/sip: usage of IS_INTERACTIVE=yes Message-ID: <20030727182029.GA5494@krion> In-Reply-To: <3F241674.4070809@web.de> References: <3F241674.4070809@web.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:14:12PM +0200, Eugene Ossintsev wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I'm preparing the updates for x11-toolkits/py-qt and devel/sip. > Both ports print the following during the installation: >=20 > ----------------------------- > This is the GPL version of SIP and is licensed under the GNU General=20 > Public License. >=20 > Type 'L' to view the license. > Type 'yes' to accept the terms of the license. > Type 'no' to decline the terms of the license. >=20 > Do you accept the terms of the license? > ----------------------------- >=20 >=20 > The current devel/sip Makefile has a parameter IS_INTERACTIVE=3Dyes, but= =20 > x11-toolits/py-qt Makefile doesn't have it. >=20 > What would be more reasonable (and legitimate): to set IS_INTERACTIVE=20 > for the both Makefiles (that is perhaps not good for night builds) or to= =20 > accept the license silently in the both cases (automatically giving=20 > "yes" to the input)? See also: PR/51290 But I've never got any reply from nbm -Kirill --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/JBftQC1G6a60JuURAqy9AJ9u1q65jle91CMQh5LJirPd82tJ3wCg/RWV 4hh9/O5+N1sKfpg9ncU69hE= =fzhq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030727182029.GA5494>