Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:58:07 -0500 From: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: # of bpf devices Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.0.20010328165743.03e98220@mail.etinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20010328121742.B83100@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010328144755.01fd9eb0@mail.etinc.com> <Your <5.0.0.25.0.20010328133247.036d9370@mail.etinc.com> <97519.985804357@critter> <5.0.0.25.0.20010328144755.01fd9eb0@mail.etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 03:17 PM 03/28/2001, David O'Brien wrote: >On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:49:53PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > > > >It seems that only 256 bpf devices are supported. How painful would > it be > > > >to increase that number...I assume its an 8bit varable somewhere? > Are there > > > >other caveats? > > > > > >It's pretty trivial. Send a patch when you are done. > > > > I was hoping to get some useful insight before I looked into it..or if > > there was a sound reason for not expanding them. Im hopeful someone > > brighter will answer. > >You did. "pretty trival". I.E. will not take much work, and no good >reason not to expand them. Since you've said so many times you can hack >your own system, sounds like PHK told you what you needed to know. What a helpful bunch. thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.0.25.0.20010328165743.03e98220>