From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org  Tue Apr 19 14:33:02 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F592B13E80;
 Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2804A1699;
 Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1asWi2-00089U-DU; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:32:58 +0300
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:32:58 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, lev@FreeBSD.org,
 Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)
Message-ID: <20160419143258.GH4841@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <20160302235429.GD75641@FreeBSD.org> <57152CE5.5050500@FreeBSD.org>
 <9D4B9C8B-41D7-42BC-B436-D23EFFF60261@ixsystems.com>
 <20160418191425.GW1554@FreeBSD.org> <571533B8.6090109@freebsd.org>
 <20160418194010.GX1554@FreeBSD.org> <57153E80.4080800@FreeBSD.org>
 <571551AB.4070203@freebsd.org> <5715E1E9.8060507@freebsd.org>
 <57164068.8080800@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57164068.8080800@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:33:02 -0000

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:27:52AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> Again, the point is that those objecting should put aside the time to 
> implement what you (and I) are suggesting:
> 
> > I could live with:
> >
> > base-utils    11.1
> >  - ktrace  uninstalled
> >  - tcpdump uninstalled
> >  + dd          11.1.1   (CVE-123412 fix)
> >
> >
> >
> > but not
> > {700 packages )
> > dd  11.1.1 dd with CVE fix
> > {29 more packages}
> > [tcpdump line is not present but you don't notice that]
> > {10 more packages}
> > [ktrace line would be here but you don't notice that either]
> > {15 more packages}
> 
> What should not happen is that this incremental step forward be blocked 
> by those unwilling to hash out the next steps.

Teoretical.
In practical this is happen with me.