Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:20:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Victor Balada Diaz <victor@bsdes.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing dependencies on shared libraries Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141520060.3907@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20060414190010.GB702@pato.euesrg02.net> References: <20060414182846.GA702@pato.euesrg02.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141439280.3685@sea.ntplx.net> <20060414190010.GB702@pato.euesrg02.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?) >>> libraries: >>> >>> pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so >>> /usr/lib/libfetch.so: >>> libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x4816a000) >>> libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x48198000) >>> >>> does anyone know why? >> >> AFAIK, it's being worked on. It's not just libc either, -pthread >> also has to start linking to libpthread. > > Thanks for your fast reply. > > I'm trying to create a dependency in some libraries, but it does > have the same problem as the libc. Is there any way to workaround it? Well, you can always try adding -lc. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141520060.3907>