From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 30 10:44:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F3BB79092 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 10:44:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0101015c58b3dc58-1b936a1a-8412-472b-a257-c436a40e89f2-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com) Received: from a27-35.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com (a27-35.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com [54.240.27.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FED806F6 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 10:44:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0101015c58b3dc58-1b936a1a-8412-472b-a257-c436a40e89f2-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=stdm37fqbypyvw6iolbo3nkyd73es3w7; d=vmeta.jp; t=1496136801; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID; bh=+sbgQiHzPcqL2tzRt/vVTMDKByiWCD3VkG1sHOiffsE=; b=mPD7Mk0aAWH3SAX3eP7WVc7RN448gfjlrDwD3TjrpFmxOQRM2SzAEZL2B9zwa9FW 4MY3VWkI89TJHbC0GZvIUwLtCwyZOrh7auTgXJuTcuZ7XUk+bD4f+JMRjCEaGpQptas jubfWxIhSoRxCYIuwrBBayOxve/4spUr9DfO4fH8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=hsbnp7p3ensaochzwyq5wwmceodymuwv; d=amazonses.com; t=1496136801; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID; bh=+sbgQiHzPcqL2tzRt/vVTMDKByiWCD3VkG1sHOiffsE=; b=MuDhE6XevUR2bQgYX/gojjBjO5wpvg4oonOLe8VZu+rNUnNr7YDRQ2PAbz2f2Lqo fKGcsNI6/CqAKPvm05y32yYTSlX1K31sc+3J8NeWz6z2D0f9Zo7/dH1tx1ybhF/Thpw 97VMYzD+hQfcTRdkR9Ws3DtbfysDwYsw5VsTGeKA= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on glory.vmeta.jp X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 09:33:21 +0000 From: Koichiro IWAO To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Is it possible to use more than 1 CPUs during pkg create? Message-ID: <0101015c58b3dc58-1b936a1a-8412-472b-a257-c436a40e89f2-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> X-Sender: meta@vmeta.jp User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.4 X-SES-Outgoing: 2017.05.30-54.240.27.35 Feedback-ID: 1.us-west-2.ngRt4x2U/cWqug8pbfjwMxB6pcDw1fmN73bGmMLYyRI=:AmazonSES X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 10:44:46 -0000 Hi, is it possible to use more than 1 CPU cores during xz compression done in pkg create? I know XZ Utils in base system can use more than 1 CPUs if -T option given. I guess pkg internally calls APIs of XZ Utils. I think it is potentially possible. Or is it restricted to use only 1 CPU core for some reasons? -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta