From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Aug 20 9:30:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC0F14CB9 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:30:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id JAA07152; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908201630.JAA07152@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: John Polstra Subject: Re: misc/12438: Dynamic loader or vtable problem in 3.2-STABLE and 4.0-CURRENT Reply-To: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/12438; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Polstra To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: genek@narus.com Subject: Re: misc/12438: Dynamic loader or vtable problem in 3.2-STABLE and 4.0-CURRENT Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT) I think I understand, but I want to make sure. > liba.so contains class A : public baseclass. > libb.so contains class B : public baseclass. > > Both shared objects contain a function getinterface() which returns a > new instance of baseclass appropriate to that .so. You are saying that getinterface() is a global symbol in each .so, right? John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message