From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 23 12:07:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FC416A416 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-chat@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3012D43DDE for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:05:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-chat@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GbyYU-0006CW-Aj for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:05:22 +0200 Received: from 161.53.72.113 ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:05:22 +0200 Received: from ivoras by 161.53.72.113 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:05:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:05:07 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <20061021190315.7aa63143.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> <200610231140.k9NBeBK9049488@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 161.53.72.113 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060625) In-Reply-To: <200610231140.k9NBeBK9049488@lurza.secnetix.de> Sender: news Subject: Re: FreeBSD branches stats X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:07:13 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > > However, the number for 2.x systems seems a bit high indeed. > I think the users who still run 2.x systems tend to tune > them manually and watch the lists closely for things that > need to be patched. Or the script is picking maybe NetBSD or OpenBSD, both of which had 2.x versions comparatively recently?