From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Dec 21 13:33:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC23037B41B for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:33:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from 1cust201.tnt1.ogden.ut.da.uu.net ([63.39.40.201] helo=mindspring.com) by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16HXHo-0003bb-00; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:33:00 -0800 Message-ID: <3C23AA8B.B88C06F@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:32:59 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew C. Hornback" Cc: Jeremiah Gowdy , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Microsoft Advocacy? References: <002701c188e7$295a6f20$6600000a@ach.domain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Andrew C. Hornback" wrote: > This mailing list is called freebsd-advocacy. That has nothing to do with > Microsoft, therefore Microsoft discussion and traffic should be considered > off topic. Or am I incorrect in making that assumption? Nope, you are exactly right. There was a legitimate argument when advocacy of an OS other than FreeBSD for the desktop was constrained to -chat (it fell within the charter of the list, unfortunately). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message