From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 21:30:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669E416A41B for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsc@admadic.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82FC13C46E for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsc@admadic.de) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: lUESeo99iNzPSoaxNYLEYM0vFQKTxznPOmIi0KhUTW8YiUQ81L1EhArvS/8= Received: from srv.lpz.q-17.de.local (dslb-088-074-166-185.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.74.166.185]) by post.webmailer.de (fruni mo39) (RZmta 14.3) with ESMTP id q00317jANJkpp8 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:30:05 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Received: (qmail 5111 invoked by uid 98); 23 Nov 2007 21:01:08 -0000 Received: from 192.168.40.21 by srv.lpz.q-17.de.local (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.01 ( Clear:RC:1(192.168.40.21):. Processed in 0.035016 secs); 23 Nov 2007 21:01:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.40.21?) (192.168.40.21) by srvfb.lpz.q-17.de.local with SMTP; 23 Nov 2007 21:01:08 -0000 Message-ID: <47473F97.4030906@admadic.de> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:01:11 +0100 From: Rainer Schwarze User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <47443BE1.2080308@admadic.de> <20071123012758.GA29752@hades.panopticon> <4746DE95.8070304@admadic.de> <20071123192500.GA37829@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20071123192500.GA37829@hades.panopticon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Newbie: problem using SUB_LIST in Makefile - SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:30:13 -0000 Dmitry Marakasov wrote: [...] > For example, you have: > OPTIONS= CWRAPPER "C wrapper" on > > and in /etc/make.conf: > WITHOUT_CWRAPPER= yes # I don't want any *** C wrappers!!! > > Thus, both WITHOUT_CWRAPPER and WITH_CWRAPPER will be defined, but the > port will behave correctly if you check for WITHOUT_CWRAPPER. > Actually, this was fixed, so you can check for either WITH_ or WITHOUT_ > as you like (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-April/039831.html), > but I prefer to stick with scheme described above. Ah! Good to know :-) Thanks for the information. Best wishes, Rainer --