From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 24 23:08:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59177F9 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.nomadlogic.org (mail.nomadlogic.org [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a098::4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD388BBE for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.nomadlogic.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nomadlogic.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA11125EE1 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop.rubicorp.com (unknown [72.34.113.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nomadlogic.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0741C125EBA for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <544ADBEB.2030907@nomadlogic.org> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:08:27 -0700 From: Pete Wright User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: NATed or Private Network Setups Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:08:28 -0000 Hi All, Has anyone deployed bhyve using NAT'd or private network setups? I've been able to deploy bridged interfaces, but I was wondering if anyone has done other network topologies. Is there anything preventing this from happening code wise? I reckon it could be achieved by creating a pseudo interface? Thanks in advance! -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org twitter => @nomadlogicLA