From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 19 11:22:39 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA29115 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:22:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivory.lm.com (ivory.lm.com [192.231.221.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA29105 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from peterb@localhost) by ivory.lm.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA01210; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:19:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:19:19 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Berger X-Sender: peterb@ivory.lm.com To: Terry Lambert cc: "Garrett A. Wollman" , terry@lambert.org, freebsd-questions@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 (or more) LAN interface on SAME subnet ? In-Reply-To: <199512191750.KAA14777@phaeton.artisoft.com> Message-ID: X-Mentos: The Freshmaker! X-Request-Do: resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Ok, -now- I'm thoroughly confused. My current network architecture (for my personal network at home!) looks like this: ------------- 147.72.1.2 | 147.72.56.1--------------147.72.56.1 ----------- (netblazer) |----------------------|FreeBSD |================|..56.2 | ------------- -------------- ---(pc)---- ^ppp link ^ethernet Both tun0 and ep0 have the same IP address (147.72.56.1). I haven't noticed any problems just yet. Are you saying that this is somehow invalid, and need difference networks on each interface? or is it the -destination- network that matters? I'm confused. Please enlighten me. "The law locks up both man and woman / Who steals the goose from off the common, But lets the greater felon loose / Who steals the common from the goose." -anon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Berger - peterb@telerama.lm.com - http://www.lm.com/~peterb