From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Sep 26 15:24:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56395A093F3 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3216B2D7 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A1133C46; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:24:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AAA9C39819; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:24:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Pallav Bose via freebsd-questions Cc: Pallav Bose Subject: Re: Interrupt storm and poor disk performance | mfi(4) driver | FreeBSD 8 | Dell PERC H730 References: <472489221.917644.1443216922050.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:24:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <472489221.917644.1443216922050.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> (Pallav Bose via freebsd-questions's message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2015 21:35:22 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <44lhbtyzin.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:24:48 -0000 Pallav Bose via freebsd-questions writes: > I have a Dell PowerEdge R430 server with a PERC H730 RAID > controller. I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8 to install and run on this > server. At this time, I have a patched version of the mfi(4) driver > which attaches to the controller. I'm aware of mrsas(4), but since I > have scripts that use mfiutil(8), I'd like to continue using the > mfi(4) driver. I don't see an obvious issue. To be honest, I am not willing to spend much time figuring out problems with an out-of-support release. I am sure that other people act similarly.