From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Sep 16 12:13:41 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D61C14D61
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 12:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dispatch@blackhelicopters.org)
Received: (from dispatch@localhost)
	by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA58074;
	Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:13:23 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from dispatch)
From: Dispatcher <dispatch@blackhelicopters.org>
Message-Id: <199909161913.PAA58074@blackhelicopters.org>
Subject: Re: 3.3-STABLE
In-Reply-To: <003201bf0076$b9559d80$256b52c6@tasam.com> from Joe Gleason at "Sep 16, 1999  3: 6:38 pm"
To: jogleaso@vt.edu (Joe Gleason)
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:13:23 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Oh yea...I was wondering this, why not create a dns round-robin for cvsup
> servers?  That way if any of the servers are down or busy, the retry will
> probably goto a diffrent sever making and if everyone just used the round
> robin, then the load will be quite evenly distributed.

As in so many other things FreeBSD, the answer is:

This issue has been debated to death.  Please check the -stable and
-current archives.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message