Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Jan 2018 13:52:17 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 214864] [exp-run] test build with lld as /usr/bin/ld
Message-ID:  <bug-214864-13-bsmzalD4WG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-214864-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-214864-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214864

--- Comment #93 from Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Kirill Ponomarev from comment #92)
> Ed, I finished adding LLD_UNSAFE to all broken ports, which needed it, I =
think
> we can do exp-build once again to finish ports job.

Thank you, I agree one more exp-run is valuable. We're definitely into the =
long
tail but should take one last look for anything that must be addressed in t=
he
near term.

> lang/fpc is the only port which requires attention, but this failure shou=
ld be
> reported to upstream first.

Yep, I submitted one some time ago:
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=3D32900

That bug is for the root cause; we probably also want to submit a patch to
allow $LD to override the linker, and apply that workaround to the port in =
the
short term.

> I think now, we're in good shape from ports view to switch to default ld.=
lld.
> After adding man page we can proceed with it IMO.

I agree.

Thanks for all of the effort you've put into addressing these!

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-214864-13-bsmzalD4WG>