From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 11 07:41:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA04231 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post.io.org (post.io.org [198.133.36.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA04221; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 07:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zap.io.org (taob@zap.io.org [198.133.36.81]) by post.io.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA03196; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 10:39:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 10:40:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao To: reichert@internet.com cc: jkh@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ahhhhhhhhhh! In-Reply-To: <199606101718.NAA27079@oneida.internet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 10 Jun 1996, Brian Reichert wrote: > > For what it's worth, I'm running 2.1R and procmail v3.10. Throw procmail 3.10 away!!! I had odd problems with 3.10 on both BSD/OS and FreeBSD. Upgrade to the latest procmail 3.11 prerelease (3.11pre3, I think it is). It fixes *many* problems on BSD systems and it has worked flawlessly here, including properly locking NFS- mounted mailboxes. -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org, taob@ican.net) Systems and Network Administrator, Internet Canada Corp. "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"