From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:39:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC1716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:39:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net (ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C2043D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:39:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from [10.10.10.210] (ppp211-161.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.122.211.161]) by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jA71dJ7Z080685 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:09:20 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Message-ID: <436EB046.1010305@kbc.net.au> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:09:18 +1030 From: Matthew Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> <20051106231903.GA46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E98B4.5080708@kbc.net.au> <2A52F60F-4FAA-4A78-A5BB-AB3B598A6B1B@secure-computing.net> <436EAB0E.2080104@kbc.net.au> <191587E5-6B8F-47D4-9156-C0B162A59DE3@secure-computing.net> In-Reply-To: <191587E5-6B8F-47D4-9156-C0B162A59DE3@secure-computing.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:39:24 -0000 Eric F Crist wrote: > On Nov 6, 2005, at 7:17 PM, Matthew Smith wrote: > >> Just a minor point - is 6 actually a stable version? I was wondering >> whether I've gone and picked up a development version when I should have >> been using 5.something. > > It's officially a RELEASE, but I won't trust it until 6.3 or later on a > production machine. Unless you're using some really special/new > hardware, I would recommend attempting to install 5.4. Thanks - I'm using extremely non-special and old hardware, so I'll grab the 5.4 release and start over. Hopefully I'll have more luck this time... I will report back. Cheers M -- Matthew Smith Kadina Business Consultancy, South Australia Work: Personal: