From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Aug 7 12:41:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-48.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.48]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779FA37B409 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 12:41:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83A6766CB5; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 12:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 12:41:06 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Fernan Aguero Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: do i need to make the world? Message-ID: <20010807124105.C81773@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar on Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:42:01PM -0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:42:01PM -0300, Fernan Aguero wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have just installed 4.3-RELEASE from the CD and now I am updating=20 > my sources using cvsup >=20 > src-all tag=3DRELENG_4_3 > ports-all tag=3D. # CURRENT >=20 > after reading /usr/src/UPDATING I noticed that there were only 9=20 > commits from RELEASE to now. > Is it safe to make only the targets touched by the commits? (telnetd,=20 > openssh, etc ...) Depends what you mean by safe. If you are certain you know every file touched by the change, including dependencies, then you can do this. But if that was the case then you probably wouldn't have needed to ask the question. The _safe_ thing to do is a full rebuild of world, kernel, and /etc following the procedure in the handbook, so you know you're not missing anything. > Is it safe to keep a CURRENT ports tree together with a userland that=20 > is not in synch (i.e. does not belong to CURRENT)? Yes..there are only a few ports like lsof which have their fingers deep in kernel data structures which often get broken when you update the kernel. Kris --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7cERRWry0BWjoQKURAskzAJ4xLNIrCG2MDm4wK8fCzq7P+4RRdwCguvKs aegbM5uUKu7LOYXqxWG7SA4= =d9kZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message