From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  3 21:46:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6678816A4CF; Tue,  3 Feb 2004 21:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tepkom.ru (mail.tepkom.ru [195.9.10.14])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 23F8843D46; Tue,  3 Feb 2004 21:46:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from wart@mojo.tepkom.ru)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.tepkom.ru (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 66DE62B23; Wed,  4 Feb 2004 08:46:18 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mojo.tepkom.ru (mojo.tepkom.ru [195.9.10.30])
	by mail.tepkom.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5906E2B12; Wed,  4 Feb 2004 08:46:18 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mojo.tepkom.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A035A639FF; Wed,  4 Feb 2004 08:43:58 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:43:58 +0300
From: Wartan Hachaturow <wart@tepkom.ru>
To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20040204054358.GA21384@mojo.tepkom.ru>
References: <20040203213613.GA28189@mojo.tepkom.ru>
	<20040204033832.GA3952@VARK.homeunix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040204033832.GA3952@VARK.homeunix.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SCCS and batch environment utiltites.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 05:46:12 -0000

On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:38:32PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:

> That said, I don't see any reason SCCS
> has to be in the base system unless FreeBSD is actively seeking POSIX
> certification.

Exactly that was a question I tried to rise -- are we actively seeking
POSIX certification, or just trying to be "mostly compatible"?
Considering also the fact that FreeBSD is, perhaps, the closest
to that state between other free un*xes.

-- 
Regards, Wartan.
"Be different: conform."